Fundamentally, if you do not care whether you are out participate in conversations while you would with individuals you’re down with, but there is you don’t need to announce any such thing, just solution truthfully when they ask. If they are spouting off certain prejudices about bis, go on and state those do not connect with you. If the problem is gay/bi liberties in basic, argue it through the point of view of a person, maybe not someone playing the straw guy homo card to pull some heartstrings to your part. published by schroedinger at 2:41 PM on 23, 2005 I like xo’s analogy about mothers with dead children august. A whole lot. Thanks, xo, I’d been searching for an excellent one.
grahamwell, i am really confused regarding the confusion:
In less contexts that are political, such as for example everyone else speaing frankly about the attractiveness of a female, me personally saying she actually is not too hot, one member of the family saying, “oh yeah? she would not cause you to get across that line? (smirk, wink)”. That discussion could just occur in an assumed context that is heterosexual a guy (clearly). Or have you any idea one thing I do not? This exactly just how we notice it: Anon’s in legislation: “cannot you imagine Paris Hilton is hot?” Anon (feminine): “No, ew.” Anon’s in legislation: “Oh yeah? She would not make that line is crossed by you? smirk, wink.” (presumption of anon’s heterosexuality) Anon (feminine): thinks “No, ew, but Maura Tierney, hoo kid!” but states absolutely nothing.Read More›